Reps are just like something that tells how a person describe you. It does not define you so you can just ignore it ^_^

I agree with you DON, the -1 rep about the 40bill training is uncalled for. 8/10.

i magree you krey and infernap gave my cousin bull crap reps you sabatauged it saying it rated 1b traing ya bud have fun its sy cress its rate is mor dont beleve me ?[you must login to view links]

@tntt that was for a legit reason. thomsap was giving negative reps to people who didn't accept his trades either because they didn't want to spend money on it or because they did not agree with him on a price. Which is kinda like rage-quitting on Call of Duty if you know what I mean. Nobody likes a rage-quitter.

March 14, 2013 5:35:55pmkray Wrote:  @tntt that was for a legit reason. thomsap was giving negative reps to people who didn't accept his trades either because they didn't want to spend money on it or because they did not agree with him on a price. Which is kinda like rage-quitting on Call of Duty if you know what I mean. Nobody likes a rage-quitter.

no. he gave a -1 to don because he said it rates 100 coins and posted it onto his thread sayin it only rates 100 coins LOL so in my opinoin he deserves the -1 he had to sell it for 1k

Hold on before you start taking a side over your "cousin" ask him to show you the PM's between me and him where i stated to him "what do you want for it coins, pokemon or training" and he stated training. I said ok how meny B he stated a dumb figure and i said NO but good luck selling it, if he dont want feedback on a dumb estermate of it rates 5k dont make a thread because there was no definate proof that it rated that and thus in the 100% official thread created by ROWL I.D #111111 >[you must login to view links] NO SHINY CRESSELIA IS IN THAT LIST...P.s please tell me that stating 100 coins LOOL sabotages a trade?